Work with me

Structured engagements with clear deliverables.

Engagements include operational reviews and structured briefings for utility-scale solar and wind portfolios, climate technology founders, and capital allocators evaluating infrastructure decisions.

Renewable Energy

Asset owners, operators, and portfolio managers

Whether an asset is in development or already operating, the questions shaping its performance span the same terrain: revenue structure, contractual obligations, technical performance, and the tools and workflows that hold everything together in practice. I work with owners and operators across that full picture, from the questions being asked before operations begin to the ones that only surface once the asset is live.

The gap between how an asset was modelled and how it actually performs rarely announces itself clearly. It shows up in dispatch decisions, in contract terms that looked standard until they weren't, in platform choices that seemed equivalent until the reporting requirements changed. I work with owners and operators to build clarity across the operational picture: asset onboarding workflows, revenue stack performance, market participation frameworks, tools and platform assessment, and the stakeholder communications that sit on top of all of it.

The work typically takes the form of a structured operational review — a bounded engagement of four to six weeks that produces a written assessment and a set of implementable recommendations you can act on without translating them first.Start a conversation

New entrants, corporate strategy, and expansion teams

The renewable energy space is attracting a wide range of entrants: infrastructure owners, technology providers, platform builders, and service firms. The operational and technical realities of the sector are specific, and they shape what works differently depending on how you are entering and navigating it. I work with organisations mapping that terrain before their strategy commits to it.

The technical and commercial realities of renewable energy assets — how they perform, how obligations sit in practice, where the friction accumulates — are not always visible from the outside and are not uniform across asset types or geographies. I work with organisations entering or expanding within the space to build an honest picture of what the sector demands. Not to complicate the decision, but to make sure the assumptions underneath it are ones you would choose knowingly.

The work typically produces a structured briefing: a written document that maps the operational and commercial landscape as it applies to your specific entry point, delivered over two to four weeks.Start a conversation

Climate and Impact

Founders, technical teams, and communications leads

Climate technology companies are often communicating across a significant knowledge gap — not because their audiences are not sophisticated, but because the specific combination of science, engineering, and market context that makes a technology compelling is genuinely difficult to convey without losing either the rigour or the clarity. I work with founders and teams to build that communication from the ground up.

The work starts with understanding what has been built well enough to represent it honestly, then constructing the arc from scientific reality through operational plausibility to economic viability in a way that holds together for different audiences and contexts. That might mean narrative architecture, investor materials, visual explainers, or ongoing communications support. The goal in each case is the same: a structured argument that does not require the audience to already share your technical frame in order to follow it.

The first engagement typically produces a narrative framework — the structured argument that a technical founder can stand behind and a capital allocator can act on — which can then be adapted across investor materials, technical explainers, and ongoing communications. This is not pitch deck design. It is the architecture that makes all of those more coherent.Start a conversation

Investors, allocators, and investment teams

Climate infrastructure and technology decisions involve physical systems, operational constraints, and market structures that do not always surface cleanly in standard analytical frameworks. I work with investors who want a grounded reading of that terrain — the contextual layer that sits upstream of the financial analysis and shapes what the financial analysis should actually be asking.

Investment analysis of climate assets tends to draw on separate disciplines at each layer. Physical risk, operational performance, market structure, and financial projections are often developed by different teams or advisors, and the assumptions passed between them are not always made explicit. The gaps in those handoffs are where surprises tend to accumulate. I work with investors to build a cross-system picture of a technology class, a market structure, or an infrastructure decision. Not deal assessment, but the grounding that makes evaluation clearer on its own terms.

The work is typically a bespoke briefing on a specific technology class, market structure, or infrastructure context — a written analysis, delivered over two to four weeks, that makes the cross-system picture legible before the financial modelling begins.Start a conversation

Prefer email? hello@arcclima.com